The use of real-time data and the potential menuisation of insurance premiums is on the horizon, however is this an industry asset or a gimmick?

As insurers and brokers alike scrabble to source in-house data science teams and business decision-making is increasingly becoming data-driven, the use of real-time data within insurance products is escalating at a correspondingly rapid pace.

Telematics based on real-time data is becoming more sophisticated, but new trends – such as menuisation – are also starting to come to the fore.

For Glen Clarke, head of transformational propositions at Allianz, this is because of a shift in underwriting focus, from using past data and projections based on a minimum of customer touchpoints, to instead offering quotes based on up-to-the-minute data.

“That movement from what happened, to what’s happening, to what’s going to happen is a theme that underpins a lot of product development, as we go from risk assessment to risk mitigation, to risk management and prevention,” he said.

With the rise of real-time data and its usage also comes the idea of menuisation. Alexandra Foster, director of insurance, wealth management and financial services at BT, explained: “You have different levels or real-time menuisation of insurance and it becomes a different sort of insurance policy.

“When something’s in your home, it’s insured at X; when it’s outside of your home, it’s insured at two [times] X because of the mobility factor. That’s where real-time data with real-time decision-making comes into play.”

The aim of menuisation, therefore, is to ensure that premium pricing better reflects the day-to-day risks experienced by policyholders; this is supported by real-time data gained via customers themselves inputting information on an app or website, or through cloud-based technology, such as telematics tools.

Rob Hartley, co-founder at Dinghy, added: “There’s a large surge in on-demand insurance. We’re going to that culture where people do move around, do want to have flexibility with their lifestyle. I do think insurance has got to move that way.”

For Clarke, menuisation could be the solution to over and under insurance. “The greater we can really understand the policyholder and the risks that they’re undertaking, the better we can make sure that we’re matching product and price to match that risk as well,” he said. “It’s just being fuelled now by data in a way which it wasn’t before.”

However, Peter Blanc, group chief executive at Aston Lark, questioned the actual savings policyholders could gain through menuisation. For example, with a motor insurance policy, menuisation would dictate that when the vehicle is static on a driveway, this would be considered a lower risk and therefore have a cheaper premium. When out on the road, this would be a greater risk with a higher premium price attached.

“Cars are normally static, stood on their driveway 95% of the time. The road risk is only 5% of the time, but probably 95% of the premium,” he explained. “If you start trying to discount premium because the car if off the road, the maximum theoretically you can discount the premium by is 5%.

“It’s a bit of a gimmicky idea.”

Market usage

Although the implementation of menuisation is still in its infancy, with insurtechs scratching their heads over potential products, real-time data is already in use, primarily within the car, household and drone insurance arenas. “We’re seeing [real-time data] appear in almost every line of business, although to what meaningful extent is still fairly early days. We’re at the start of something rather than something that’s mature,” Clarke said.

Hartley, however, sees opportunities for real-time data to expand into business insurance. “What I expect to see in business around employers’ liability will be much more flexible based on the number of employees [firms] have; we might see that changing with open banking,” he added. This would involve, for example, seeing employees’ pay being transferred over open banking and knowing how many staff are on the payroll and what they have been paid for – the insured then wouldn’t have to make any declarations, if needed, and insurance adjustments could be made in real-time.

Challenges

Despite the potential advantages, there are still considerations around menuisation for insurers, brokers and insurtechs.

For example, Hartley noted that crossing different regulatory boundaries between commercial and personal line insurance could prove tricky. He also observed that real-time telematics data could cause monthly premiums to drastically change month-on-month, but “customers like the stability of knowing that they’re not going to pay more than a certain amount”.

Blanc, on the other hand, warned that the insurance sector should not rely too heavily on data. “We have to be really careful that data doesn’t end up excluding some customers from claiming insurance,” he added.

Allianz’s Clarke puts forward data ethics as a further challenge. He said: “With real-time data comes a lot of responsibility and so the real task in hand here is to make sure that there is a proper value exchange with the end customer when we’re using real-time data.

“The customer’s got to fully understand how their data is being used, for what means and what value they’re going to derive out of it, so that they can make informed decisions on whether to go down that path.”

Silver bullet?

However, for Blanc, the use of real-time data in insurance products is not a silver bullet for more accurately priced premiums.

He said: “One of the wonderful things about insurance is, no matter how good your data and no matter how up-to-the-minute, it doesn’t change the fact that the world is an uncertain place and things happen that no one predicts. That’s the whole point of insurance.

“Real-time data is an attempt by underwriters to try and cherry pick risks that they think will never have a claim, but of course, that’s just not the way the world works.

“Just because risks have never had a claim and all the data says they won’t ever have a claim, doesn’t stop something unusual happening that causes a claim.

“My biggest concern is that as brokers and as an insurance profession, we’ve got to make sure above all else [that] our products are fit for purpose and actually deliver what customers need.

“Unfortunately, there’s too much of a trend of people just trying to make products cheap rather than necessarily trying to make them good.”

PASS NOTES

time

Is menuisation just a buzzword?

Although menuisation is still very early in its development, Clarke warned against falling into the “hype cycle” trap. He said: “It’s quite hyped at the moment in terms of real-time data [connected] to insurance, internet of things, machine learning, all of these associated areas. With hype, you tend to end up overestimating the impact of things in the short-term but, critically, underestimating their impact in the long-term.”

What about the role of insurtechs here?

The role of insurtechs is clearly a cog in menuisation’s creation, however industry voices fall either side of the fence when it comes to deciding whether insurtechs are actually delivering.

Clarke, for example, believes that insurtechs have “a very interesting role in the development of real-time” and sees “them as catalysts or agents of change”. Hartley agreed that they “have a huge role to play in this”.

Blanc, on the other hand, questioned their usefulness. “Unfortunately, quite a lot of insurtechs are solving problems that aren’t really there or they’re trying to solve things they think are a problem, but actually customers don’t think are a problem.”

What are the dangers of on-demand insurance?

The ability for policyholders to turn insurance on and off is also gaining greater traction. For example, Allianz is underwriting on-demand business insurance via insurtech Dinghy, which provides professional indemnity, public liability and business equipment cover to freelancers. This uses the policyholder as a real-time data source to switch cover on or off depending on when they are working.

Despite being designed to accommodate the burgeoning gig economy, Blanc has his doubts on the model. “There’s a big concern in my mind about this trend towards trying to treat insurance as something that gets turned on and turned off. Customers do not go home at night and just think non-stop about insurance. The risks of somebody starting a job and not being insured should far outweigh any attempt to try and menuise.”